Current law in Malta
The VFA Act provides a framework for virtual financial assets, including ICOs, and entities that transact with them, such as virtual asset exchanges, investment advisors, wallet providers, brokers, and portfolio managers.
Malta has adopted a financial instrument test that anyone intending to launch an ICO in or from Malta must undertake to determine the type of asset being created and the laws applicable to the ICO and the tokens themselves. If the asset is defined as a “virtual financial asset” or “VFA” (defined as any form of digital medium of record used as a digital intermediary, unit of account or deposit, other than a financial instrument, virtual token or electronic money), it will be regulated by the VFA Act.
Financial Instruments – The definition of a financial instrument is in accordance with the EU Markets in Financial Services Directive (MiFID) and the Malta Investment Services Act, and activities related to financial instruments are regulated by the Investment Services Act;
A virtual token is a token whose utility, value or use is limited to obtaining goods or services or is limited to within or to the registered platform on which it is issued, or within a limited distributed platform network. Virtual tokens are typically service tokens whose only utility and value is to purchase goods or services on the DLT platform on which they are issued. Activities related to virtual tokens are not regulated; finally,
E-money – To be considered e-money, a DLT asset must be issued at a nominal value upon receipt of funds from the issuer and can only be redeemed at any time by the issuer. It should be used for payments and should be accepted as a means of payment by non-issuers.
If a DLT asset can be converted into another DLT, it will be considered the type of DLT asset that it can be converted into. Generally, most virtual assets are virtual financial assets.
The main difference compared to Hong Kong is that there is currently no specific legislation in Hong Kong for ICOs or virtual assets. However, this will change if, in November 2020, the FSTB proposes to issue licenses for virtual asset exchanges under Hong Kong's anti-money laundering legislation. In addition, in Hong Kong, there is no strict distinction between different types of tokens unless the tokens have the characteristics of securities. Otherwise, all tokens are considered virtual commodities.
Technical description content requirements
The DFA Act does not require issuers to obtain a license or register with the MFA, but they must publish technical documentation that complies with various requirements set out in the DFA Act. This requirement applies to any legal entity that intends to (i) offer virtual financial assets to the public in or from Malta or (ii) trade virtual financial assets on a DLT exchange. The definition of a VFA issuer only applies to legal entities established under Maltese law. Therefore, if an issuer wishes to host a VFA (i.e. an ICO), it must be registered in Malta. If the DLT asset is defined as a virtual token (not regulated by the VFA), no technical documentation is required. VAIOT announced in October 2020 that its technical documentation was successfully registered with the MFSA, becoming the first project regulated by the VFA Act.
Issuer Responsibilities
VFA issuers are obliged to comply with the issuer obligations, which in short relate to conducting business in a competent, prudent, careful and diligent manner; investor relations, conflicts of interest, investor protection, administrative mechanisms, security and compliance with POD/FT.
The issuer will be liable to any person for compensation if he or she suffers a loss as a result of purchasing a virtual financial asset (whether on the original VFA offer or on the basis of trading DLT on the issuer’s official documents or advertisements based on false information) of the virtual financial asset.
This is similar to the FCS's regulatory approach, whereby investor protection measures applicable only to traditional intermediaries are limited under the FCS Code of Conduct, as the FCS Code of Conduct does not apply to issuers of securities and therefore contains no obligations. Issuers are required to ensure the accuracy of the information presented in their marketing documents in a typical offering of securities tokens, as well as to assess the suitability of their tokens for potential buyers. However, issuers may be held liable for fraud, theft or misleading statements if they make false or misleading statements in their official documents.